Hump Day Poll: Newsworthy?
source If that brings you warm fuzzies, you're welcome. If you don't know what the heck that's referring to, then you might be too young to understand most of my references here and should probably brush up ! We are going on year 9 of not having watched the news. I remember the last time we went to Kauai in 2016 (holy crap, that makes me want to cry) we didn't watch the news once and couldn't believe how much happier we were. We decided to see how long we could push it and here we are almost a decade later. It's enough to be inundated on internet sites on the hourly with the latest dumpster fire lit that should have nothing to do with the kind of stuff it's reporting but to voluntarily watch the news just is not something I have in me. I rarely watch live tv because of the commercials (well more commercials) but I left it on once a few years ago when a show I was watching went live and the news came on right after. I wasn't watchin...
I don't know what to tell you. I am sorry though. I really thought last week was the start of something good for you.
ReplyDeleteOMG, that completely SUCKS!!! I hate it when you think you've figured something out, and then wham! No good! I'm sorry, Mrs :(
ReplyDeleteI hope you saved a finger for 'the universe' or whatever it is that gives you the 'ooh hope springs again' one week and then 'psych!' the next week! I'm sorry, Mrs.
ReplyDeleteDang! So sorry to hear that! I really thought that last week was the beginning of you losing again. I'm still keeping my fingers crossed that next week you'll see a loss despite Aunt Flo coming for a visit.
ReplyDeleteNot gonna lie--that STINKS to high heaven. The whole 'it's simple math' stuff they try to tell us about weight loss is just plain not true. If it were, we'd be losing at a consistent rate. I hope you're wrong and see a loss next week in spite of Aunt Flo. Something's gotta go in the right direction soon, doesn't it? Doesn't it??
ReplyDeleteBoooooo to the goose egg!!! Yep a good double-pump of telling the scale that it's "# 1" is definitely warranted here...
ReplyDelete